Kentucky Senate passes bill on wildlife management

By Blake Jackson

The Kentucky Senate, led by a GOP majority, narrowly passed a bill proposing significant changes to the state's wildlife management agency and the racing commission. The bill, Senate Bill 3, aims to move the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFWR) from the tourism cabinet to the Kentucky Department of Agriculture. This move would also transfer the power of appointing members to the Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Commission from the Governor to the Agriculture Commissioner.

Opponents, including sportsmen's groups, express concerns about the bill, fearing it could undermine wildlife conservation efforts. They argue that agriculture interests may not align with the goals of wildlife management. However, proponents of the bill, led by Sen. Jason Howell, believe that aligning the KDFWR with the Department of Agriculture could foster cooperation and rural economic development.

In addition to the KDFWR changes, the bill also proposes attaching the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission to the Department of Agriculture. This move would involve Senate confirmation of gubernatorial appointments to the racing commission, adding a layer of oversight.

During debates, Sen. Robin Webb withdrew amendments aiming to maintain the autonomy of the KDFWR, citing likely futility in offering them. She highlighted concerns about the potential conflict of interest if agricultural interests dominate the commission's membership.

However, supporters of the bill, like Sen. Shelley Funke Frommeyer, see potential benefits in coupling agriculture and wildlife management, citing personal experiences of harmony between farming and hunting on their lands.

Meanwhile, Sen. Adrienne Southworth pushed back, arguing that issues with the KDFWR are not solely caused by the executive branch. She emphasized constituents' requests for Senate confirmation of commission appointments as a solution to perceived disconnects.

Critics of the bill worry that an agriculture commissioner might prioritize agricultural interests over wildlife conservation. Edwin Nighbert, president of the League of Kentucky Sportsmen, expresses concern that appointees with strong agricultural ties could undermine wildlife conservation efforts.

Despite concerns, the bill passed the Senate Agriculture Committee earlier in the week. KDFWR Commissioner Rich Storm, while not taking a stance on the bill, expressed confidence in the department's ability to maintain independence while attached to the Department of Agriculture.

As the bill moves to the Kentucky House of Representatives for consideration, stakeholders continue to debate its potential impact on wildlife conservation and agricultural interests. While some see the proposed changes as a step towards cooperation and economic development, others fear it could compromise the mission of wildlife conservation in the state.

Photo Credit: gettyimages-luc-pouliot